New: Skyward Dream — explore Aviation Careers after 12thOpen portal →
Skip to content
Opinion

28 accidents. 69 dead. The regulator’s failures are on record. Nobody has answered for them.

Capt. Amit Singh FRAeS, Founder & Director, Safety Matters Foundation

28 of 54 accidents where the AAIB report documents a DGCA failing; 69 killed; 99 seriously injured; 259 of 606 recommendations to DGCA; 0 replies published; 11 reports with earlier recommendations unimplemented.

For eight years, India’s accident investigator has been writing down the regulator’s failures. Approvals that should never have been granted. Audits that found nothing wrong months before a crash. Findings closed on paper and left open on the ground. Then it sent those findings to the regulator, and nothing happened.

Safety Matters Foundation read every final report the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has published for occurrences between 2018 and 2025, all 129 of them. In 28 of the 54 accidents, the report itself documents a failing by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). Those 28 accidents killed 69 people and seriously injured 99.

These are not our accusations. They are AAIB’s findings, in AAIB’s words.

AAIB quote: The DGCA Safety Audit Report of April 2019 ... as Satisfactory is factually incorrect and misleading.

The record

Timeline of the 28 accidents, 2018 to 2025, in which AAIB documented a DGCA failing, sized by deaths.

Flying schools, helicopters, airlines, charter operators, state aircraft. The failings are not confined to one corner of Indian aviation, and neither are the deaths.

Deaths in the 28 accidents by operation: helicopters 29, airlines 22, flying schools 10, charter 5, state aircraft 2, gliders 1.

Kozhikode: ten years of warnings

On 7 August 2020, Air India Express flight 1344 overran the tabletop runway at Kozhikode. Twenty-one people died and 76 were seriously injured. It was almost a replay of Mangalore in 2010, when another Air India Express jet overran another tabletop runway and 158 people died.

Mangalore 2010, 158 killed; Kozhikode 2020, 21 killed. AAIB: FOQA recommendations after Mangalore not addressed for 10 years.

AAIB’s Kozhikode report is the most damning document the regulator has ever had written about it. It found that DGCA had been “accepting low DFDR monitoring figures” with safety audits “closed without any follow up action”. It found that DGCA did not carry out surveillance of flights to critical airfields and red-eye flights. And it recorded that officials at DGCA headquarters “did not agree to come and meet the Investigation Team”.

Kedarnath: three warnings, fifteen dead

Kedarnath route: October 2022, 7 killed; April 2023, 1 killed; June 2025, 7 killed. AAIB found the rules inadequate each time.

In October 2022 a Bell 407 crashed at Garud Chatti near Kedarnath, killing seven. AAIB found the rules for operating from the Kedarnath helipad “vague and not conducive for safe operations”. Six months later, in April 2023, a man was killed at the Kedarnath helipad itself, and AAIB again found the provision “not conducive for safe operations”. In June 2025 another Bell 407 went down near Gaurikund. Seven more people died. AAIB’s report on that crash notes that “some of the issues raised by AAIB in their report were not addressed” in DGCA’s revised circular.

15 dead
in three accidents on one pilgrimage route, each one preceded or followed by an AAIB finding that the rules were not good enough.

Audits that look away

In October 2019 a Cessna 172 trainer crashed near Sultanpur in Telangana, killing two. DGCA had audited the flying school three months earlier and found no operational safety problems. After the crash, DGCA audited it again. AAIB’s verdict on that second audit:

AAIB quote: the purpose of this audit was not proactive but rather was to restart the flying activities of the FTO at the earliest.

In Ghatkopar, Mumbai, in June 2018, a King Air crashed into a construction site, killing five, including a pedestrian. AAIB found DGCA had issued the operator’s permit “without an adequate safety mechanism being validated”, and that audit non-conformities were closed without anything changing on the ground.

AAIB quote: Non-conformities found during various audits were closed by DGCA without ensuring compliance at ground level.

At Vijayawada in 2021, AAIB found that the same audit findings had appeared three years running, closed every time, and every time graded Level II. At Dhanbad in 2023, it found DGCA had never overseen the glider school at all:

AAIB quote: However, the DGCA never carried out any safety oversight of M/s JFI Dhanbad airport base.

The black hole

606 AAIB recommendations; 259 addressed to DGCA; 0 DGCA replies published.

AAIB’s 129 reports contain 606 safety recommendations; 259 are addressed to DGCA. Under AAIB’s own published procedure, DGCA must reply within 90 days and AAIB must judge whether the reply is adequate. Not one of those replies, and not one of those judgements, has ever been made public.

The reports themselves show what happens. In 11 of them, AAIB records that earlier recommendations had still not been implemented. After the Guna trainer accident in 2024, AAIB noted it had already recommended that DGCA mandate recording of radio communication between aircraft and ATC, and that “the same recommendation is still pending”.

In 2020 I asked AAIB, under the RTI Act, what action had followed its findings against DGCA in two fatal accidents. The answer, for both, was four words: “Matter pertains to DGCA.” The investigator finds that the regulator failed, and hands the finding to the regulator. Nobody else checks.

Only one side ever answers

Operator: 3 Air India officials removed within days. Regulator: no public record of action against any DGCA official.

When an accident happens, DGCA acts against the operator, and it should. Within days of the Ahmedabad crash in June 2025, it ordered Air India to remove three officials from crew-scheduling roles. But when AAIB documents that DGCA’s own approval, audit or rule failed, there is no equivalent. We could find no public record of action against any DGCA official for any of the failings documented in these 28 accidents.

A safety system in which only one side is ever accountable will keep producing the same accidents.

A regulator that cannot close what it finds

80% of DGCA inspection findings open (3,747 of 4,692); 48% of DGCA posts vacant (787 of 1,630).

Parliament’s transport committee reported that DGCA’s own inspectors raised 4,692 safety findings between January and April 2025. By April, 3,747, four in five, were still open. Thirty-seven were Level I: an immediate danger to safety. Meanwhile, 787 of DGCA’s 1,630 sanctioned posts are vacant. A regulator that cannot staff itself cannot close what it finds, and the hazards it leaves open come back as accidents.

Even the investigator is stretched

After Kozhikode, AAIB was told to build its own cadre of permanent investigators and a properly equipped flight-recorder laboratory. In August 2025 the Government told Parliament those recommendations had been implemented. Two months earlier, when AI171 crashed at Ahmedabad, AAIB drew on DGCA officers for the investigation and needed equipment from the US NTSB to read the recorders. A recommendation marked “implemented” is not the same as a capability that exists.

The loop is broken

Diagram: accident, AAIB finds a DGCA failing, recommendation sent to DGCA, DGCA judges its own failure; the published reply and independent check are missing, so the same hazard leads to the next accident.

Safety management works on one principle: every hazard has an owner, and someone checks that the owner fixed it. In India the loop stops at DGCA. The investigator’s findings go in; nothing comes out; and the same hazards return in the next report.

What must change

None of this needs a new law to begin. It needs four decisions.

1
Make DGCA answer
Every AAIB finding against DGCA gets a public reply from the Ministry of Civil Aviation within 90 days: who was responsible, and what was done.
2
Check independently
An independent panel reporting to Parliament verifies whether each failing was actually fixed. Parliament’s transport committee called for an independent safety review in March 2026.
3
Publish the record
AAIB publishes every recommendation, DGCA’s reply and whether it was carried out. Section 4 of the RTI Act already requires proactive disclosure.
4
Free the investigator
No DGCA staff on investigations where DGCA’s own role is in question. AAIB gets its own permanent investigators, specialists and laboratory.
See all 28 accidents, and what AAIB found about DGCA in each
DateAircraft / placeDGCA failing documented by AAIB (SMF summary)KilledSeriously injured
2018-01VT-PWA
Bombay High (offshore), near Mumbai
Audit report never given to the operator; no debrief70
2018-06VT-UPZ
Ghatkopar, Mumbai
Operating permit granted without a validated safety system; audit faults left uncorrected53
2019-07VT-SYK
Mumbai airport
DGCA audits missed serious safety weaknesses00
2019-08VT-HDX
Moldi village, Uttarkashi, Uttarakhand
DGCA inspectors did not perform their assigned relief-operations role30
2019-08VT-SVK
Tikochi village, Uttarkashi, Uttarakhand
No guidelines or coordination for relief flights01
2019-10VT-RGF
Sultanpur village, Telangana
Audits checked paperwork only; post-accident audit aimed at resuming flying20
2020-01VT-CAF
Near Dhana Aerodrome, Sagar (MP)
Night-flying procedure submitted in 2013 never acted on20
2020-02VT-GLE
Dumka
Glider circulars not available to training institutes11
2020-06VT-ENF
Birasal, Odisha
Instructor approved despite known weaknesses; flawed safety manual accepted20
2020-08VT-AXH
Kozhikode
Flight-data monitoring accepted without follow-up; rule not revised after 2010 crash2176
2020-09VT-IGE
Azamgarh district, U.P.
No weather guidelines for flying schools10
2021-02VT-GHE
Vijayawada Airport
Same audit findings closed three years running00
2021-05VT-MPQ
Gwalior Airport (IAF base)
Audit finding dropped; manual and simulator oversight lapses02
2021-06VT-IYX
Hubli Airport, Karnataka
No DGCA rule for post-incident medical tests, so the crew was never tested00
2021-07VT-BRP
Satpura jungle near Vardi village, Shirpur
DGCA circular silent on recording radio calls at uncontrolled airfields11
2022-01VT-AMU
Agricultural field near Aligarh Aerodrome
Faulty training manual approved and renewed repeatedly00
2022-02VT-FAO
Near Thungathurthi village, Nalgonda, Telangana
Earlier AAIB recommendations on radio recording never implemented by DGCA10
2022-05VT-SLH
En-route Durgapur
Aircraft released to lessor without AAIB clearance13
2022-05VT-CHG
Raipur Airport
Safety manual unapproved; surveillance inadequate20
2022-06VT-PWI
Sagar Kiran offshore helideck, Mumbai offshore
Flotation equipment not checked at inspection or certification42
2022-10VT-RPN
Garud Chatti, near Kedarnath Helipad
Kedarnath operating rules vague and unsafe70
2023-01VT-PTE
Umari Village near Rewa, M.P.
Obsolete circular left in force; night-flying rules unclear11
2023-02VT-RGT
Thiruvananthapuram Airport
No rule covering student pilots in this situation00
2023-03VT-GDI
Dhanbad Airport
No oversight of the glider school; licences issued improperly01
2023-04VT-RNK
Kedarnath helipad
No one responsible for supervising Kedarnath helipad10
2023-09VT-DBL
Mumbai Airport
DGCA audits found no significant safety issues08
2024-03VT-CHP
Guna Aerodrome, Madhya Pradesh
Radio recording still not required despite earlier AAIB recommendation00
2025-06VT-BKA
Near Gaurikund, Uttarakhand
Revised circular ignored points AAIB had raised earlier70
28 accidents6999

Plain-language summaries by Safety Matters Foundation. AAIB’s exact words and section references are in the full report.

Safety improves when hazards have owners. Today, too many of the hazards AAIB identifies have none. Until someone is made responsible for closing them, the reports will keep describing the same failures, in new accidents, with new names.

THE FULL EVIDENCE
Known Hazards, No Owner
All 129 AAIB reports analysed. Every DGCA finding quoted, with section references.
Download the report (PDF)

All counts are Safety Matters Foundation’s analysis of AAIB’s published final reports, 2018–2025; quotations are verbatim, with section references in the full report. Parliamentary figures are from the Standing Committee on Transport, Tourism and Culture. “No public record” means none was found; the authorities can correct the record by publishing it.


Discover more from Safety Matters Foundation

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Discover more from Safety Matters Foundation

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Safety Matters Foundation

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading